Turn on JavaScript to run this simulator.

You can still read the scenario, the rules being demonstrated, and the possible outcomes on this page.

Deal clearance simulator

A due-diligence app wants to clear a sample counterparty. VeriProof checks the clearance against legal controls before the transaction proceeds.

How the simulation works

The website proposes approval. VeriProof checks the rules.

The website simulates the agent
Every prepared scenario starts with the website acting as an AI agent and proposing approval.
VeriProof enforces the business rules
VeriProof checks the proposed approval against the rules prepared for this demo.
The website applies the result
VeriProof returns one of five outcomes: Allow, Warn, Transform, Escalate, or Deny. The website applies that outcome to the simulated action.

In a real integration, your application applies VeriProof's result before the proposed action proceeds.

Choose what the agent approvesEvery prepared scenario starts with simulated agent approval
See VeriProof's decisionPass, escalate, or stop based on the business rules

Choose a scenario

The deal-clearance matter

Each sample clearance ends differently. Pick one, or change the screening facts below.

Sample counterparty: Aldergate Capital Partners, ownership pending
Jurisdiction: Cyprus
Transaction value: $12,000,000
Sanctions screening: No sanctions match
Beneficial ownership is verified: No

Change scenario details

Sample counterpartyJurisdictionTransaction valueSanctions screeningBeneficial ownership is verifiedPEP exposure is presentAdverse-media hitsActive-litigation flags

The due-diligence app proposes to clear this counterparty.

Ownership is still unverified. VeriProof stops the proposed $12 million clearance under the legal team’s rule.

Records created in this public demo can be seen by other visitors, so use the sample data rather than your own.

Configuration details

How this demo is set up

Review the application settings, rules, and evidence fields used in this simulator.

VeriProof setup

Industry: Legal & RegTech
Application: Due Diligence Screener
Environment: Public demo workspace
Rule enforcement: Enforce: check rules before clearance
Rule set: Counterparty clearance and ownership safeguards

Related frameworks

NIST AI RMF GDPR

Industry context: FATF beneficial ownership guidance · OFAC compliance framework · FCPA resource guide · ABA Formal Opinion 512

The screener's own checks

The sample app proposes clearance based on a limited set of checks.

Refuse a counterparty with a confirmed sanctions match.
Send one or two adverse-media hits for review.
Propose clearance for other matters. VeriProof then checks whether ownership verification is complete.

The legal controls VeriProof enforces

The legal team sets these sample controls outside the app. VeriProof checks them before clearance takes effect.

Stop a clearance of $1 million or more without verified beneficial ownership.
Stop a clearance with an unresolved sanctions match.
Require partner review for political exposure or at least three adverse-media hits.

Review the details saved with each run

When saving succeeds, the record contains sample screening facts and decisions. Document contents are not included.

counterparty_name / matter_id

The sample reference used to find the clearance record.

jurisdiction / opacity_risk

The place of formation and its configured ownership-transparency risk.

transaction_value_usd / sanctions_screen_result

The value and sanctions result checked before clearance.

beneficial_ownership_verified / pep_exposure

The ownership facts used by stop and review controls.

adverse_media_hits / active_litigation_flags

The screening counts preserved without document contents.

local_decision / governance_action / final_decision

The screener decision, control check, and actual outcome saved separately.