Roles and handoffs

A portal for every role, with the handoffs built in

Most agent tooling is built for developers. VeriProof gives each of the six roles that put an agent into production a portal built for its part of the work. When something needs one of them, it reaches that person with the context and a due date, and the answer comes back.

Six roles with different decisions to make

Business value and risk

Business Owner

Is the workflow delivering the intended value? Follow outcomes and operating risk, then make the decisions assigned to your role.

Review use cases

Calculate business value

Rules and policy

Governance Engineer

Turn business requirements into policy your team can test. Review rule behavior and publish versions through the authorized workflow.

Review policy decisions →

Requirements and review

Compliance Officer

Connect requirements to the evidence behind a decision. Review framework coverage, address gaps, and prepare records for an assessment.

Review framework mappings →

Application connection

Developer

Bring policy checks into the application. Supported SDKs and APIs connect the decision, human response, and reported outcome while your application controls execution.

Review integrations →

Access and operations

Administrator

Keep access aligned with each person's work. Manage users and application settings within your administrative permissions.

Review security and deployment →

Independent review

Auditor

Follow the evidence without changing the work. Inspect decision history and record integrity within the scope of your audit engagement.

Review record integrity →

How the teams work together

The work reaches the right person, and the answer comes back

Without built-in handoffs, each of these runs through email, chat, a ticket, or a meeting, and every new agent adds more of them. In VeriProof, every agent uses the same handoffs, so each piece of work has an owner and the record shows who did what.

  • An agent action needs a person

    Reviewer with authority

    The reviewer gets the facts and the choices available to them. Reminders go out, overdue work escalates, and the decision goes back to the agent.

  • A rule needs data the agent does not send

    Developer

    The application’s developer gets a fix request. It closes when the data arrives, and compliance is asked to check again.

  • A governance engineer changes a rule for a production agent

    Administrator or Compliance Officer

    They approve the tested version before it applies. Your organization can also require up to two approvers besides the author before any rule is enforced.

  • A control is not met

    Assigned owner

    The compliance officer assigns the fix with an owner, a due date, and a priority, and tracks it to resolution.

  • A risk needs a business decision

    Business Owner

    Compliance proposes accepting it and names you as the approver. You decide, with reminders, and approved risks come back for review.

  • An audit begins

    Auditor

    The auditor works inside an engagement scoped to the applications and dates under review, and sees what evidence is missing.

Common questions

Each role gets the views and actions permitted for its work. Teams can follow the same decision history without giving everyone the same access.

Your review settings route the exception to an authorized person. The request explains what needs a decision and the responses available to that reviewer.

Your organization sets that authority through policy and review permissions. VeriProof returns the decision; the connected application applies it.

No. Auditors can inspect the records and export evidence within their authorized scope. They cannot operate applications or change rules.

Try the handoffs with your own team

Use the free 60-day Developer evaluation to test how developers, reviewers, and business owners work together. Check each person's information and authority.