Each agent brings its own controls
Teams build agents with different SDKs, frameworks, browsers, and enterprise platforms. Without a shared approach, each one needs its own approval.
For the business owner
Your agents can act. Getting them approved for production is the harder problem.
You fund the agents and answer for their results. Before they take real actions, risk, compliance, and audit need to see they'll follow the rules. VeriProof shows them. Each action is checked, exceptions reach whoever holds the authority, and every decision is mapped to your frameworks and kept on record, the same way for every agent you add.
Why agents stall between pilot and production
For production approval, teams need to know who may approve exceptions, which rules applied, and what the application reported afterward.
Approvals drift away from the action
A yes in email or chat may not show who had authority, what they approved, or whether the agent followed the decision.
Logs stop short of proof
For each decision, keep the rule, authorized review, and application-reported outcome together so risk and audit teams can follow the record.
One way of working
Four steps for every consequential action
VeriProof applies the same steps across SDK-based agents, computer-use agents, and Copilot Studio agents, without replacing your AI, cloud, workflow, or monitoring platforms.
Enforce
The proposed action is checked against the rules and business facts for its application. The agent gets one of five answers: Allow (continue as submitted), Warn (continue with a warning), Transform (continue with a corrected version), Escalate (wait for a person with authority), or Deny (stop).
Coordinate
An escalated action goes to whoever holds the authority, with the context they need to decide. Their answer goes back to the agent.
Comply
Each decision is mapped to the frameworks you answer to, so compliance sees coverage control by control.
Prove
The rule, the review, the agent's response, and the outcome stay together in one sealed record that an auditor can quickly and independently verify.
Who else signs off, and how the work reaches them
Several people have a say before an agent goes live. Each of the six roles has its own portal, and these handoffs between them are built in.
An action needs a person
It reaches whoever holds the authority, in the VeriProof Inbox, by email, or in Slack or Microsoft Teams, with the facts and their choices. Reminders go out, overdue work escalates, and the decision goes back to the agent.
A rule needs data the agent doesn't send
The developer who owns the integration gets a fix request. It closes when the data arrives.
A rule changes
It has to pass its tests before it's enforced, and it can run in Shadow first. A governance engineer's change to a production agent goes to an administrator or compliance officer.
A control isn't met
The gap shows up against the framework it belongs to, and the compliance officer assigns the fix with an owner, a due date, and a priority.
A risk needs a business decision
Compliance proposes accepting it and names you as the approver. The decision is yours, and it comes back for review later.
An audit begins
Auditors work inside an engagement scoped to the agents and dates under review. They can see what evidence is missing.
See the decision behind a checked action
This example runs in Copilot Studio with synthetic data. A user asks the agent to approve a loan, and the lending service checks the current facts against policy before changing the record.
Start with one agent
Pick an agent action where a rule, a person's approval, or the record decides whether it reaches production. See what a week of that work looks like, or bring it to a 30-minute working session.